 | United States. Supreme Court - 1917
...dissolved. With this modification the decree of the state court is affirmed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA dissents. sion was first explicitly made in the petition for writ of error to this court. There... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1899
...other plaintiffs in error, citizens of Ohio, the Judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not Inconsistent with this opinion. It Is so ordered. Mr. Justice BREWER, dissenting. I am unable to concur In the opinion of the court in tills caso. In my judgment... | |
 | 1904
...judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania should be reversed and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Mr. Justice Harían and Mr. Justice Brewer dissented. (192 US 64) POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1980
...foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Arizona Supreme Court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, with whom MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN joins, concurring. I join the opinion of the Court, which holds... | |
 | 1917
...dissolved. With this modification the decree of the state court is affirmed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Mr. Justice McKenna dissents. UNITED STATES SUPREME COtRT. PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT, & POWER COMPANY v. CHARLES... | |
 | Charles Willis Needham - 1925 - 1599 pages
...business is adequate. * * * The judgments, respectively, are reversed and the cases are remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Mr. Justice PITNEY dissents. NOTE: 1. "The fundamental question presented is whether the validity of the passenger... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1945
...affirming Ashcraft's conviction is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE JACKSON, dissenting: A sovereign State is now before us, summoned on the charge that it has obtained... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1947
...and that against petitioner Ware is vacated. Both cases are remanded to the state supreme court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER joins in this opinion on the basis of the decision in Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 322 US 143. MR. JUSTICE... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Employment Security - 1963
...Amendment. The judgment of the South Carolina Supreme Court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Mr. Justice Douglas, concurring. The case we have for decision seems to me to be of small dimensions, though profoundly... | |
| |
Appeals affirming this conviction is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER concurs in the result. 
