Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association, Volume 4The Association, 1912 |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association, Volume 2 Nebraska State Bar Association Affichage du livre entier - 1909 |
Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association, Volume 9 Nebraska State Bar Association Affichage du livre entier - 1916 |
Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association, Volume 6 Nebraska State Bar Association Affichage du livre entier - 1913 |
Expressions et termes fréquents
Adams administration admission adopted amendment American Bar American Bar Association appeal Broken Bow Buren Chairman civil clients Committee on Inquiry Committee on Legal Constitution county attorneys County Bar Association court of last criminal David City December 27 district attorney district court Ehrhardt elected Ellick ethical ex-president experience federal form of government Fremont Grand Island Greeley County Grover Cleveland instruction Jefferson Judge judgment jury justice Kearney last resort Law French law school law teaching lawyer Legal Education legislation legislature Lincoln Omaha litigation Lynn Helm ment Nebraska City Nebraska State Bar North Platte Omaha Lincoln Omaha Omaha Omaha Omaha Printing Company opinion Plattsmouth political practice present President Proceedings A. B. A. profession prosecution question reason recommendation republican republican form requirement Roscoe Pound says Secretary Section statute Supreme Court Thomas tion trial Union United vote voucher W. G. Hastings
Fréquemment cités
Page 128 - Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne, — Yet that scaffold sways the future, and, behind the dim unknown, Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above his own.
Page 22 - All courts shall be open; and every man, for an injury done him in his lands, goods, person, or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered, without sale, denial, or delay.
Page 80 - From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction.
Page 81 - The two great points of difference, between a Democracy and a Republic, are, first, the delegation of the Government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest : Secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended.
Page 83 - The effect of the first difference is, on the one hand, to refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations.
Page 88 - The government, then, of the United States, can claim, no powers which are not granted to it by the constitution, and -the powers actually granted must be such as are expressly given, or given by necessary implication.
Page 85 - there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.
Page 88 - The government of the United States is one of delegated powers alone. Its authority is defined and limited by the Constitution. All powers not granted to it by that instrument are reserved to the States or the people. No rights can be acquired under the constitution or laws of the United States, except such as the government of the United States has the authority to grant or secure. All that cannot be so granted or secured are left under the protection of the States.
Page 24 - The judicial power of this state shall be vested in a supreme court, district courts, county courts, justices of the peace, police magistrates, and in such other cut,< inferior to the district courts as may be created by law for cities and incorporated towns.
Page 82 - It may possibly be asked, what need there could be of such a precaution, and whether it may not become a pretext for alterations in the state governments, without the concurrence of the states themselves. These questions admit of ready answers. If the interposition of the general government should not be needed, the provision for such an event will be a harmless superfluity only in the cor-*1*-*"" u"t who can say, what experiments may be produced by the caprice of particular states.